Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Friday, November 15, 2013

An American's Adventures in London

The unglamorous Hayes and Harlington Train Station
Photo by Sunil060902
If you're an American living abroad, please complete the Overseas Exile expat survey.

It's not always glamorous being an expat. Rather than give you a proper post today, I'm going to take us back in time to March 2007. I was "living" in London (the quotes will become clear in a moment) and wrote a rather odd blog post. Back then, I was blogging to tell friends what I was up to, rather than blogging for a general audience. As such, the tone of my posts was considerably different from the material you get today. Before I share the post, I should explain the circumstances that my readers at the time understood.

I moved to Nottingham, a small town a couple of hours north of London, in June of 2006. Just over half a year later, the company I was working for announced they were shutting down the Nottingham offices and if we wanted to keep our jobs, we had to move to London. To make a long story very short, the company put all of us up in a hotel for three months — a hotel in Hayes, a suburb of London once described by George Orwell (yes, that Orwell) as "one of the most godforsaken places I have ever struck."

Case in point: shortly after we were herded into this hotel in the middle of nowhere, someone was murdered in the pub next to the hotel. The pub was packed, but there were no witnesses. Those of us in the hotel started referring to it as "the murder pub." We avoided that pub and either we made the long trek into London via the miserable Hayes and Harlington train station or we sat in the hotel bar, night after night, drinking. Sometimes startled guests would walk into the common area of the hotel to find my colleagues wearing pajamas, watching "footy on the telly" with a lager clenched in one hand and the remote in the other (to prevent people from changing the channel). Living in this hotel is how I came to write the following blog entry entitled "Gustatorial Adumbration and the Sheep of the Universe".



"Where you from, mate?"

"The U.S."

"'Ere on holiday?"

How he missed the first 'h' and caught the second is one of those mysteries of English speech that I still can't figure out. Like cricket, it's something that Americans are Not Meant to Understand.

"No, I live here in London."

"What're you doin' in the hotel, then?"

"I sort of live here. It's a long story."

And it is a long story. Or a short one. All depends on where you start, really. I've spent several weeks at the Heathrow Comfort Inn Hotel, but I'm basically living in a bar with two or three dozen of my closest coworkers. I can't really count them. Sometimes they're here. Sometimes they leave for the weekend to go home to Nottingham, Beeston, or wherever else they have a real home, traveling to London only to put in their time in a soulless business park. And drink. Lots.

Earlier I was listening to a woman's conversation in what passes for a restaurant at the Heathrow Comfort Inn Hotel. At £14.99 a plate, I would think they'd be able to hire a competent chef. Instead, they serve tasteless slop, devoid of spices, though if you're lucky, you'll get a tough, chewy papadum with it. A papadum is crisp; it snaps apart. Not these. More than once I've watched people struggle to tear one to pieces before shoving a bit in their mouth, their eyes widening in gustatorial horror. It's symbolic of the entire menu.

Curiously, my browser says the word "papadum" is misspelled. In searching through their spelling suggestions, starting, perhaps not inappropriately, with the word "escapades", I see the word "adumbrate". What the hell is that? Looking it up I see that it means, amongst other things, "to foreshadow." What a fucking perfect word. I don't have a spell checker built into my browser, I have a coauthor. I will never look at Firefox the same way again (and perhaps will be more careful about what I type to whom).

Getting back to the woman, she was nattering on about this and about that and her voice had a quality like an itch under the skin, one where you quietly sit there and scratch and scratch and get no relief at all. That's because she had an American accent. Finding American accents irritating is not something I expected upon moving over here, but then I remember I have an American accent, too.

Sitting in my bar, a few days ago, I was reading a book, turning page after page, desperately trying to figure out how our hero was going to survive my next whiskey, when I realized I couldn't figure out what language the ladies at the table to my left were speaking. Well, one of the ladies, actually. Two of them were speaking English, but the third was chattering away on her cell phone and, jarred away from my book, I wondered what country she was from. I wondered what her childhood was like, how she, too, came to be in this overpriced hotel — whose incredibly friendly staff is its only saving grace — when the awful truth hit me: she was Scottish. My brain switched to the "Scottish" filter and I could slowly make out what she was saying. She was talking about picking up some food from the store, but with a thick, burly accent that would as soon stick a knife in your kidney as say "'ere on holiday?"

Curiously, I usually don't have too much difficulty understanding the thicker accents. A couple of weeks ago, enjoying a night out at the downstairs bar with an Irishman, a Glaswegian (someone from Glasgow, Scotland), and an English lady, we found ourselves well in our cups, teasing the Englishwoman because I, the American, had no problem following the conversation but she kept asking them to repeat themselves because their accents were too thick.

Later, the conversation turned, as it naturally does, to quantum physics and cosmology. David, the Irishman, was trying to explain to the English lady something about the "shape of the universe", but we couldn't stop laughing because his Irish accent kept forcing him to say "the sheep of the universe". Eventually, superstring theory became superwool theory and we decided the universe is filled with billions and billions of subatomic sheep. God is my shepherd. The Bible, the definitive text on biology, will, in a pinch, fill in as a physics textbook.

Last week, about a dozen of us went to see the movie 300 at the IMAX theater in Waterloo. If you've ever been to an IMAX theater, you know these are the largest movie screens in the world and they have to have special film for their projectors. These things are huge. Which is why you might understand why I say that the naked women were not exactly titillating. Nipples the size of my head are not erotic.

I might add that there's not much point in seeing this movie. It's gay porn without gay sex. And like most modern porn, it's all action, no plot. After reading about the Battle of Thermopylae, upon which the graphic novel was based (which in turn inspired the movie), I was surprised to discover the movie wasn't entirely historically inaccurate. That, or the screenwriter consulted Wikipedia before setting fingers to keyboard.

The movie, in a nutshell, is 300 very buff men wearing little more than red capes and leather codpieces the size of a small car, spraying gallons of blood everywhere while somehow remaining mysteriously free of it themselves, even their blades. Oh, and a little bit of sex in the beginning just to make sure that guys have everything they want out of a movie. I am dumber for having seen it.

On the way home, Little Miss Drunk Off Her Ass stumbled onto the Tube and, after being told that she was about to sit on something wet and unidentifiable in one of the seats, asked if she could sit down in the middle of all of us. Though there were still plenty of extra seats on the Tube and inviting yourself to join strangers is simply not done, we said that was fine and proceeded to have very strange conversation with her. She was older, might have looked posh were it not for the blood vessels on her face making it clear how she spent her free time, and, after a bit of conversation about the movie and the buff men, she looked around at all of us and said "I do prefer my men a bit thinner."

Which is why I don't really feel bad for what I said next.

"So, what do you do besides drink?"

I wish, I wish, I wish I could have recorded the look on her face.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Doing Business in La Rochelle, France

Afternoon on the Bay of Biscay
Click on the photos to see larger versions.

Life has really taken a strange and interesting turn. If you travel enough and leave yourself open to adventure, sooner or later things will happen. "Luck" usually involves hard work and perseverance, not just stumbling into good fortune.

Case in point, last Friday my wife and I were sitting in a boat, watching the last Olympic sailing trials in La Rochelle. We were surrounded by local business leaders, all of this paid for courtesy of La Rochelle and the local area governments.

Saturday, September 14, 2013

My Global Family

A few days ago I was in London on business. To my surprise, I appear to have taken far fewer photos than I realized, but that's probably a function of working hard and also spending time with my two surviving brothers in London.

This was my first flight out of the La Rochelle airport and while I knew the airport was tiny, I didn't think about the fact that I was going to be flying on this:

The plane I flew on
If you fly frequently, you know what that means.

Monday, July 22, 2013

The Ugly American

Image of American tourist, wearing plaid swim trunks and a sombrero, smoking a cigar and carrying a liquor bottle in each hand.
"The Ugly American"
American tourist in 1950's Batista-era Cuba
I'm sure that you've heard the "ugly American" stereotype before. It's prominent enough that it has its own Wikipedia page. Booming voices, plaid Bermuda shorts, mocking the locals. In fact, I've witnessed this abroad (down to the Bermuda shorts) and people are more likely to remember Americans who stand out like that. I still vividly remember standing in line at a store in Amsterdam and having a pair of American women yelling at a cashier because the women were mad that they had to weigh their own vegetables. Sadly, the "ugly American" stereotype can apply to expats as easily as tourists.

Exceptions like those yelling women aside, the stereotype is not only a bit unfair, but on those occasions that it is fair, it's not always entirely the American's fault. The US is a rather insular culture. It's expensive to see other cultures firsthand so we don't get this experience except by television or movies — and no, watching every episode of Monty Python or Dr. Who doesn't count. And it's not entirely the US media's fault, either. Strange things (other cultures) are challenging and don't drive as much revenue to the profit-maximizing entertainment industry.

So, relative to other countries, you have a rich, isolated culture whose people are often completely unprepared for the outside world, right? Well, not exactly.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Our trip to La Rochelle in Photos

The waterfront at La Rochelle
Click on any photo for a larger version.

Last weekend my wife, daughter and myself visited La Rochelle, on the West coast of France, with a sea port opening to the Bay of Biscay. We might move here. We're considering moving outside of Paris, but we've decided to stay in the country this time (Malta, Belgium, or the UK were our most likely destinations). The village is absolutely gorgeous and prices are much more reasonable than Paris. Since we've started a company that, amongst other things, does international IT recruitment, we find ourselves in the luxurious position of being able to move.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Reverse Culture Shock - You Can't Go Home Again

My wife and daughter playing with bubbles
in a friend's back yard in Portland.
My sincerest apologies for having dropped out of sight for a bit. I spent two weeks in the US, part of which was in Austin for a conference and also visiting my mother, sister and niece.  It was my first time back in Texas in 27 years.

The rest of two weeks was spent in my beloved Portland, Oregon visiting friends and my uncle and aunt. While enjoying the thrills of jet lag, I'm remembering that there is no past, only a future. I love Portland, but it's no longer home despite all of my wonderful friends there. It was with relief that I arrived at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris and knew I would soon be collapsing in my bed. I had experienced reverse culture shock.

This is not an unusual feeling for expats. Ceri, in the United Kingdom, writes about returning home after 18 months abroad teaching English. While she doesn't describe her situation as reverse culture shock and she's talking about the mess of British bureaucracy, she is nonetheless struggling to readjust to being home. Or you can read Tim Pile's description of visiting his family in the UK while he lives in Hong Kong. Or maybe you should read CNN's reverse culture shock adjustment tips.

And yet those various things they discuss, all of which I can relate to, aren't quite what I had in mind. But first I think I will offset the downsides with the upsides. My wife and I loved Portland and we're considering doing an annual house swap for a month during the summer to give our daughter (and ourselves!) more exposure to the US. The US is great in many ways, not the least of which is the friendliness and generosity of the people (just look at how much money the US donates when an international disaster strikes). The food is great (if not fattening) and thanks to cheap land, houses are huge and inexpensive compared to much of Europe.

Your author (blue shirt on the right) with his
uncle and aunt at the Portland Zoo.
And then there are the downsides. My uncle is paying $1,400 a month (!) for medical insurance that he's about to lose it. More than half the people in the US now believe that a college education costs more than it's worth and half of all Americans live in poverty. And to top it off, despite the real political problems here in France, France is far more of a democracy than the US (honestly, Romney was the best the Republicans could come up with?).

I don't know what the future holds for the US and I certainly hope it goes well, but I'm not seeing any signs of that right now. And to my shock, I've actually had conservative friends tell me that they wouldn't blame me if I gave up my citizenship. Conservative friends! I am not surprised by those comments from those on the left (well, the US version of "left"), but on the right? I have no desire to give up my US citizenship, but hearing conservatives tell me they wouldn't blame me if I bailed was yet another shock. Reverse culture shock usually involves the person returning home realizing they've changed. While that's certainly true for me, it's also true that the country I visited isn't the country I left.

So I'm back in France and I'll resume blogging again, but my last trip to the US was bittersweet. It was lovely seeing family and friends and it brought back many fond memories, but it really helped to reinforce to me that I can't go home. No matter what happens, I am and will always be an American, but I like the values over here in Europe. I like knowing that medical care is a right and not a luxury. I like knowing that my daughter won't be saddled with decades of student loan debt. I like knowing that we get enough vacation time to enjoy life and don't have to hoard vacation days carefully, occasionally spending one for a glorious three-day weekend.

I'm happy abroad and have no strong desire to return to a plutocracy.

Monday, June 3, 2013

Spit, Shoes, and Austin

Austin Skyline at Night
Photo by LoneStarMike
I'm writing this from Austin, Texas. I grew up more or less in Texas and it's been 26 or 27 years since I've been back. I'm only here for three days where I'll be speaking at a conference, and while I'm looking forward to seeing some of my professional colleagues again, I'm really looking forward to meeting some family members I've not seen in years (or in some cases, ever). I'm also craving Tex-Mex cooking. I've not had proper Tex-Mex in a long time and in Europe it's almost invariably rubbish. As I explain to my European friends who tell me that they don't like Mexican food: "you've probably never had it."

Monday, May 27, 2013

Why You Should See the World

Photo of a beautiful temple in China.
Wouldn't seeing it firsthand be better?
Photo by Carsten Ullrich
There's a very thought-provoking article at Why Young Americans Should Work Overseas. As is clear from the title, it's very much aimed at Americans but the main points are this:
  1. University education in the US is not worth the return on investment.
  2. The quality of life you get for your money is much better elsewhere.
  3. US jobs aren't going to return.
  4. It's time for everyone to explore the world.
While clearly not everyone is going to agree with the above reasons, I'm rather partial to the last one, if for no other reason than to see firsthand that the world is a much different place than what you see in the media. Still, I'll touch on all of these points as I have a front-row seat for the expat life.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Violent Crime In the US

Photo by Chang Liu
Pardon today's divergence; I'm still in shock. Today I started with the news and saw that 19 people were injured in a Mother's Day parade shooting in the US. Described by the FBI as "strictly an act of street violence", as if somehow that is more reassuring than terrorism. You have to wonder just how bad things have to get in the US before someone does anything. Sadly, due to overwhelming evidence that gun crime in the US has plummeted sharply in the past two decades, many in the US are using this as an excuse for inaction.

What they're ignoring is that gun murders in the US are far higher than the rest of the industrialized world. Just because we've improved this statistic doesn't mean that it's suddenly "acceptable." There's also another little statistic that many would rather you didn't know.

When the media is talking about how US gun crime has dropped sharply since 1993, you might ask the question "why did they pick 1993 as the year to measure from?" On one hand, this makes arbitrary sense as we can say "we looked at gun crime in the past 20 years". On the other hand, it turns out that this is a convenient year for those who would rather see nothing change: 1993 is the year that gun crime peaked in the US. Yes, you can say that "gun murders have dropped sharply in the past two decades", but you can also say "gun murders have dropped from their peak and have now returned to the levels see in the early 1960s." Let's go back a little bit further and look at another graph:
Source: US Department of Justice Statistics
Well, that changes the picture quite a bit, doesn't it? However, even that graph is misleading because it uses absolute rather than relative numbers, indicating that maybe the gun homicide rate is dropping a bit.  So let's look at the Pew Research Report that everyone is talking about but not linking to (emphasis mine):
Looking back 50 years, the U.S. gun homicide rate began rising in the 1960s, surged in the 1970s, and hit peaks in 1980 and the early 1990s. (The number of homicides peaked in the early 1990s.) The plunge in homicides after that meant that firearm homicide rates in the late 2000s were equal to those not seen since the early 1960s.
Even the most casual student of history can guess what major change was happening in the US starting in the 1960s.

The Pew report mentions that 1993 was a peak, but every single graph used throughout the entire report shows numbers dropping from a peak, so if you don't read the information carefully, you can easily be mislead. As for their "looking back 50 years", they found that information at this US Department of Justice report (pdf) which states:
In the last decade (since 2000) the homicide rate declined to levels last seen in the mid-1960s [and] the homicide rate doubled from the early 1960s to the late 1970s, increasing from 4.6 per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1962 to 9.7 per 100,000 by 1979.
And guess what? They have graphs, too.

Source: FBI Uniform Crime reports, 1950-2010
Graph reproduced from US Department of Justice report

Note that these numbers are relative and clearly show that there was a peak, but this does not include guns. However, it does tend to show the ridiculously high homicide levels in the US and I've already pointed out that the US has a much higher murder rate than most of the industrialized world, and this interactive world gun homicide map will merely drive the point home.

Why does the US accept this? We know that simply throwing people in prison doesn't make crime go away. If it did, we'd have a paradise:

Source
There's so much more which can be said about the sad state of affairs in the US. We can easily look at US history or at other nations to see multiple approaches to the problems we face, but instead the US turns to bellicose rhetoric and finger pointing, politicians jockeying for position and the American people being overlooked in the scuffle. No one seems particularly interested in information any more.

So what's going to happen after this latest shooting?

Nothing. There will be talk. There will be wailing. There might even be a cosmetic change or two, but there will be no attempt to address the underlying causes of crime in the US. There will be no serious attempt to ensure that only responsible adults have guns. There will be no national introspection regarding what is going wrong in the US.

Forget about taking away people's guns. Not only is that simply not going to happen and it won't solve the underlying problems. The US needs to wake up and start behaving like adults willing to learn and to face hard choices. Of all the strengths of the US, learning and facing hard choices aren't amongst them.

Monday, May 6, 2013

A Class for Integrating into France

Liberty Leading the People by Eugène Delacroix
"A government of the people, by the people and for the people." Does that sound familiar to anyone? That's actually the fundamental principle of the French republic, as enshrined in their constitution. In fact, as an American reading about French history and culture, I note how strong the parallels are between the two. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, separation of church and state, freedom of association, and so on. Despite superficial differences, the US and France have more in common than than either side seems to think and this was reinforced last Saturday when I attended the convocation à la formation civique, or my "call to civic education".

I didn't experience a similar class in the UK or the Netherlands (and wouldn't have experienced in Japan as I was a military brat), but here in France they take cultural integration very seriously and require you to take free classes in it. In fact, if you have the right to settle in France but don't speak the language well enough, you'll get free French courses. You'll also be required to understand the rights and responsibilities that you will have as a resident or citizen of France, hence the class I attended.

My métro stop in Bobigny
Image courtesy Clicsouris
The class lasted eight hours and was a bit boring at times because I learned most of this material in studying for the visa tests I needed to pass to get my first visa for France. Because we live about stone's throw outside the Parisian border, I had to travel to Bobigny for the class, an hour long trip by métro (because I have to travel into the center of Paris and back out again to get to Bobigny). Bobigny is not a very picturesque area and has one of the highest crime rates in France, so it's not high on my list of places to visit, but if I want permanent residency or citizenship, I can't skip this class.

The class itself was standard: start with the history of France and then discuss the structure of the government, culture of France, and move on to rights and responsibilities. About halfway through the class we broke for lunch. Our class of about 45 students was taken to a restaurant where I was served fish which tasted like it died of dehydration. The pasta, curiously, tasted like the fish and was even slathered in the same watery sauce. We had stale baguette to accompany it, but the water was excellent (cough). As a means of scoring a free meal, I would suggest dumpster diving as a preferable alternative.

Interestingly, the class focused very heavily on women's freedoms, how polygamy was illegal, and how the "right of revenge" is outlawed. I've seen these issues stressed repeatedly in the French "cultural integration" materials and I suspect that this is largely due to many immigrants coming from Africa and the Middle East (other than the instructor, I was the only caucasian in the room and the instructor was shocked to find out that I was from the US). There was actually some very lively discussion when it was explained that the wife does not need her husband's permission to take a job, at which point some men objected, arguing that there might be children at home and the woman simply can't up and take a job just because she feels like it. Our instructor (a female) shut them down pretty quickly.

I would love to find out if these classes have had any noticeable impact on assimilation of others. I'd also be curious to know if others from strongly different cultural backgrounds move here but reject the local culture (I know of at least one individual who has two wives). All things considered, I think the classes are a good thing, though I'd feel better about them if immigrants were tested on the material presented. Instead, many of them were texting their friends and a couple were sleeping, though several were very engaged in the class. Perhaps said testing is done at a later date? Are there any immigrants to France who are reading this who could comment?

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

The Face of Islam in Europe

Kahina Zed: The terrifying face of Islam
A friend of ours here in Paris, Kahina Zed, was recently in Canada with her partner and she met a bunch of Americans. After getting to know her for a couple of days, they were shocked to discover the horrifying truth: she's Muslim. They were incredulous, first assuming she was pulling their leg. With a drink in one hand and a cigarette in another, Kahina, who speaks French, English, Spanish and Arabic, is very proud of being a Muslim and, more importantly, she's practically the poster child for Islam in Europe, but you'd never know it from the news reports.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

France: Kiss or Shake Hands?

Skyline of La Défense business district in Paris
Photo by Rosss
Today's guest post is from Géraldine Lepere, the creator of Comme une Française, a web site aimed primarily at expat women who are new in France, but nonetheless is chock full of interesting tips. Today, she writes about whether or not you should kiss or shake hands in the office.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Why Should You Travel?

I have to confess that I hadn't heard about Rick Steves before now, but I really enjoyed this talk he gave at a TEDx conference (as you may know, TEDx isn't TED and it's been subject to some quality issues).


Wednesday, March 27, 2013

The Four Stages of Expat Life

Le Dernier Bar avant la Fin du Monde
Photo ruthlessly ganked from their site.
Used under Fair Use
Today I'm am very pleased to be heading to Le Dernier Bar avant la Fin du Monde, a geek bar here in Paris. As you may know, I've been helping people get jobs in Amsterdam and a gentleman from South America was offered one of the positions. By coincidence, he's visiting Paris, so my wife and I will be meeting him.

I believe (I could be mistaken) that this will be his first expat experience and that got me to thinking about how to be a successful expat. I define "successful" as "an expat who adjusts successfully to his or her new country." To succeed, it helps to know the four stages of being an expat.

Stage 1: The Honeymoon

The very first stage is the stage everyone anticipates when they dream of becoming an expat. You land in your new country and everything is magical. Accidentally brushing your teeth with hemorrhoid cream is something to laugh about. There is always something new to explore and even walking down the street is an adventure. It's like falling in love and nothing could possibly be wrong.

This stage usually lasts several weeks.

Stage 2: Homesickness

This is perhaps the hardest stage for an expat and it's the one that will cause them to pack it in and head home. There will come a point when you wake up and you would just love to share your adventures with your best friend or your sister and you can't. You want to meet them at a pub or restaurant, or just hang out at their place, but they're thousands of miles away.  Do not underestimate homesickness. People in witness protection programs have died because they gave in to their homesickness and wanted to see a bit of home. In this stage, accidentally brushing your teeth with hemorrhoid cream is something to cry about.

One key to surviving this stage is to establish a full routine and try to make it about the country. If the local language is different, take language classes. If you loved sports back home, follow local sports. Are you a political junkie? Learn the political leanings of the local newspapers and understand how the government works in your new home. Your new home won't really feel like home yet, but the more you understand it, the faster you can integrate.

Stage 3: Coping

You're finally becoming a true expat. In this stage, accidentally brushing your teeth with hemorrhoid cream is annoying.

When you get past the grief of homesickness, you're starting to adjust to your new life. You have a routine down, you probably follow the local news a bit and you're making real friends. Be careful, though: if all of your friends are expats, all of your friends will leave in the end. Make it a point to make friends with the people who have grown up in your new home. Not only will they help you to understand their culture better, you'll escape the rut of always looking at things through the eyes of a guest.

This is the second most dangerous stage of being an expat. While the immediately difficulties aren't as strong as the homesickness stage, this stage lasts a lot longer. As a result, we might even have more expats bailing out in Stage 3 than Stage 2. Continuing to work to integrate yourself into society will make this stage shorter and more pleasant.

Stage 4: Living

You're now completely an expatriate. Accidentally brushing your teeth with hemorrhoid cream just won't happen. You're fully integrated into your new life and while you will never really be a native, you're no longer the person you were. Nationality and nationalism might even become a bit of a fuzzy concept for you. Were you to return to your home country, you would likely feel out of place and struggle to cope.

These four stages last varying lengths of time and they're not exclusive. I've been permanently living abroad since 2006 and while I'm generally at Stage 4, I still experience the other stages — though not as much as I used to. Understanding these stages and how to cope with them is a great way to ensure your success as an expat.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Crime in Europe versus the US

Burglar Relief
Williamsburg Savings Bank Tower
Photo by wetman
When decided to be an expat, you naturally have to decide where to move. There are many things involved in that decision (not the least of which is "where can I move"), but crime has to be one of the more important considerations. After all, with the Honduras having the highest murder rate in the world, it's probably not your first choice of destination, right?

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Gay Expats

CSD_1761z
I have no idea if these men are gay
Photo by Jakkaphan Sanitprem
Brandon Perlberg is an American who is reluctantly living in London. He lived in New York City and loved both the city and his country, but his country wouldn't let him apply for a visa for his male partner of seven years. Brandon's partner, Benn Storey, however, is British and Britain approved Brandon's visa within 48 hours. Brandon had to give up his law career in New York for a new live abroad in order to remain with the man he loved.

Even more interesting is the fact that Perlberg and Storey could have legally married in New York state, but under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), that marriage could not be used to apply for a visa for Storey.


According to the Love Exiles Web site, the following countries all allow a same-sex partner or spouse to be sponsored for immigration.
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Israel
  • The Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • South Africa
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom
Note that this list is probably not complete and will grow over time as more countries throw overcome bigotry and fear. The US may join this list soon. President Obama has already proposed allowing immigration rights to same-sex couples, a promising step. It would help to solve problems like those of "Tom'" and "Bill", an American/Thai couple living in Thailand. They would like to live in the US and take care of Bill's elderly parents, but they can't because of US law. It's time to end this bigotry.

If you'd like to help everyone realize their dream of being an expat, regardless of sexual orientation, the following Web sites are a good start:


See also, this mailbag post I wrote abut bringing over a same-sex partner to France.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Returning to your home country

christiania, glass house, august 2007
Home, Sweet ... er ... Home
Photo by SEIER+SEIER
No matter whether or not you plan to return to your home country, many expats do. Sometimes they miss family and friends. Sometimes homesickness takes them. Sometimes the great job/relationship/adventure just ends. If you're returning home after a few months abroad, you'll probably readjust quickly. However, if you've been living abroad for a few years, be prepared to face some issues that many "repatriates" report.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

American firm gets hurt by ignoring Dutch law

Fire him at your peril.
Public Domain
For would-be expats eyeing jobs in Europe, you might find yourself wondering what would happen if you moved there and got fired. Would you have to go back? Well, you're probably not going to get fired unless you really, really deserve it.

A perfect example comes from a recent event with a US company in the Netherlands. Though the US firm is unnamed, they had very recently developed a presence in the Netherlands and decided thy were unhappy with the HR manager. So the manager was written up and fired five days later.


The courts awarded the employee 300,000 euros (approximately $390,990 US).

Yes, you read that correctly. While the amount certainly seems excessive, the details are far too scant to know (maybe that's the amount of a bonus which was missed out on or something). In any event, employee relations in Europe are far, far different from what they are in the US. Here's how it works in the US: I don't like the color of your shirt. You're fired.

Most US states are "at will" employment:
[Any] hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work.
Obviously, this is not an equal situation and in Europe, it's a bit absurd. If you land a job in Europe, you're safe (relative to how you might be treated in the US).

As a general rule, if you want to fire someone in Europe you'll need to have a paper trail documenting why you're firing someone. You need to be able to show cause and except for exceptional cases (e.g., theft), you need to show that you tried to work with the employee to resolve the situation. Naturally this is a gross generalization because there are many countries in Europe and many different sets of laws, but it seems to hold true in the various countries I've lived in or read about.

And for those who assume that these lazy socialists workers will just take advantage of their poor employers, I beg to differ. There's no safety net in the US and one wrong step can leave you unemployed. Sure, you'll probably earn a bit of a higher salary, but if you appreciate quality of life over quantity ... well ... I know I'm on the right side of the pond.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

American Movies in France

The new Die Hard movie is being advertised heavily over here. Bruce Willis' face is everywhere (which may or may not be a good thing, depending on your point of view).

I find American films in foreign countries interesting because they have a slightly different spin at at times. The title of the film, in this case, is "A Good Day to Die Hard", but in French, that doesn't translate too well, so it's Belle Journée Pour Mourir (Good Day to Die), and I think it's a, ah, nicer title.


What I particularly liked, though was the tagline on today's "20 Minutes" a free newspaper passed out in the Paris Métro. The tagline reads John McClane Demande Aussie Son Passeport Pour La Russie (John McClane also wants his Russian passport), a bit of a dig at Gerard Depardieu, to whom Russian President Putin personally authorized a Russian passport. It's not something that would really make much sense in the US, but here, it's good for a laugh.

If you go to the cinema here, American movies are often advertised as version originale, meaning that they're in English with French sub-titles. Look for the "VO" by the movie name if you want a movie you can watch and understand.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Most middle-class British families want to leave Britain

A room with a view
Tower Bridge, London. My wife and I were married there.
Photo by Tanya Hart
I've previously written about a poll showing that many Americans would like to move outside the US. Interestingly, up to 40% of younger Americans stated that they would like to live outside the US. Many Americans I've spoken with have told me they would love to live in the UK, so this suggests an obvious question: is the UK a nice place to live?

Having lived in the UK for years, I have to say it's absolutely a nice place to live. Apparently, though, the British disagree with me. A recent poll found that two in three middle-class British families would like to move abroad.

When you talk about the reasons for emigration, there are "pull" factors — adventure, a new love, a new job, and so on — and "push" factors — no work locally, escaping war, fleeing oppression, and so on. The research about why British families wanted to leave was definitely push factors: avoiding the weather, rude people, and poor values.

I can actually understand some of this. The UK has a drinking culture which absolutely floored me when I first encountered it. It's quite normal to see people stumbling around drunk on the street and vomit-strewn sidewalks near pubs. More than once I would walk into a Wetherspoons for breakfast and find people having a Full English and a pint.The weather is, admittedly, rubbish and the British economy has been stumbling. Despite this, I don't think the situation is nearly as dire as many Brits think. Part of this is the "grass is always greener" syndrome, though I confess that British people, unlike their American counterparts, have probably seen that other grass firsthand.

Of course, my "grass is always greener" theory is kind of shot to hell when I find out that 80% of British expats have no intention of returning to the UK.